Amber Heard’s six-week trial between Johnny Depp and her husband, Amber Heard, has revealed a range of personal and professional issues. Amber co-worked with other people to make the lives of Johnny’s lawyers harder, including his lead counsel, Camille Dasquez. She also had help from influential people, such as Stanford University professor Michelle Dauber.
The revelation of Amber’s involvement with Dauber was made by a user on Twitter. The professor has been connected to Amber since 2016 when they both appeared at a glamour event for women empowerment. Now, six years later, the professor is attacking Camille Vazquez online, further complicating the plot. Dauber has been criticized by several legal experts online for her actions, not only against Johnny’s lawyer but also those supporting him through this terrible ordeal.
Michelle Dauber, a Stanford law professor, has been accused of being a victim of societal pressure to seek male approval in hopes of avoiding rape, abuse, or humiliation. She shared an image of Camille Vazquez with the words of all the women who suck up to male power. Dauber’s actions have been criticized by British barrister Daniel Shensmith, and fans have called out the professor on social media.
One user wrote that Dauber is a professor at Stanford trashing Camille Vazquez for doing her job superbly, while another user praised her for her work. Another user even argued that the damage Dauber has done in Stanford University’s failure to address the issue deserves a petition.
With the amount of traction her actions have garnered, it is likely that this will affect her chances of appeal badly. Do you think Amber took things too far with this?
In conclusion, Amber Heard’s involvement in the trial between Johnny Depp and her husband has exposed her ability to co-work with others to make the lives of Johnny’s lawyers harder. Her actions have been met with criticism from legal experts and fans, and it is clear that Amber’s actions have had a significant impact on her chances of appeal.