Amber Heard and her family have been claiming to appeal the defamation case between her and Johnny Depp, but new information has revealed that they do not have a basis for their appeal. Amber’s public relations lawyer, Elaine Brewer, had been handling her public relations by going on several interviews and making various lies to get the public to sympathize with Amber. However, one aspect of her interview that was incorrect and led some people to believe she had a shot at the appeal was when she stated that they had other piles of evidence to present to the appeal court, specifically medical records argued in their closing arguments that if they found even one instance of abuse, they would have to fight for Amber Herd.
The medical records were significant because they showed a pattern back to 2012 of Amber reporting this to her therapist. The records her lawyer is referring to are her notes and statements she seemingly made to her therapist about the alleged assault, which have been proven to be false. This has raised eyebrows as they claim that the trial wasn’t fair because they were prevented from revealing these therapists’ notes.
Several people have come forward to shed light on how things actually work in the law. One user wrote on Twitter that therapist notes aren’t considered factual medical records because they can lie to a therapist and not an attending physician. Another user added that it is extremely easy to manipulate a therapist or counselor, but in a group session with many others, it is almost impossible to be manipulated.
People with BPD and high sociopath scores lie to therapists as a rule, rarely getting the care they need or improving because they do not submit to the process of self-examination, accountability, and behavior modification. Given that everyone can see the flaws in the claim they want to use as the basis for their appeal, there’s a high chance the legal parties involved in the process will also see it.